Talk:Sulphide Creek Falls

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Waterfalls task force.

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Untitled[edit]

I drastically rewrote this page because much of the data presented was either based on conjecture and supposition, or was largely irrelevant and inaccurate. I removed the former "Characteristics" section because it described details of the waterfall that simply cannot be confirmed. As one of the very few people who has been to this location I can attest that nobody has surveyed the falls to the accuracy that was being portayed by the previous version of the article. I removed the "Formation" section because it was largely unrelated, inaccurate and irrelevant to the topic at hand and should be left to either the Mount Shuksan or North Cascades articles.Bryan Swan | World Waterfall Database (talk) 23:47, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In the article on Sulphide Creek Falls at the Northwest Waterfalls page, it clearly states that the tallest drop is around 400 feet, so it wouldn't be unfair to keep that measurement as for example: "The tallest drop is more or less than 400 feet" (or something like that) instead of removing it outright.themaee 02:59, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Its reasonable to mention that as long as it is also mentioned that its a purely speculatory estimate (again, I know because I am the author and that figure was eyeballed from half a mile away). However I think that since not enough is known about the waterfall, leaving super detailed information like that out for the time being is not a bad thing.Bryan Swan | World Waterfall Database (talk) 22:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]